Webinar by Paola Criscuolo, Imperial College Business School, "Organization structure of development and firm innovation".
Imperial College Business School
March the 16th, 2021
11:00 to 12:00 London time.
Event will be held online
TECHNIS is pleased to invite you to a free webinar. TECHNIS webinars focus on IP and innovation examining recent legal, economic, managerial, ethical and policy issues related to technological innovation. Our approach is interdisciplinary and presentations are given by experts in different fields such as economics, law, management, STS, sociology, anthropology and philosophy. Webinar presentations last for 20min and are followed by a 40min discussion.
Please join us for a webinar on Tuesday the 16th of March 2021 at 11:00 London time i.e. 12:00 Brussels time, 13:00 Athens time. The speaker is Paola Criscuolo, Imperial College Business School. The title of the talk is "Organization structure of development and firm innovation" and it is joint work with Jiho Yang.
This webinar is free and open to all. The moderator is Dr. Andreas Panagopoulos. To join us follow this link: https://hello.freeconference.com/conf/call/3011249
Abstract: Research and development have different goals and present different challenges, and their organizational structure might have a differential impact on company’s innovation outcomes. However, previous research on the effect of organization structure on firms’ innovative outcomes has not distinguished between these two activities and the predictions and findings of prior studies are less applicable to development than to research. Drawing on the literature on organization structure and coordination, we articulate mechanisms through which organization structure of development activities influences innovation. Specifically, we argue that centralization of development activities restricts autonomy of business units in pursuing proprietary development projects and aggregates all information on development requirements of business units into a central, specialized development unit. These two mechanisms in turn help firms coordinate substitutable development activities and reduce duplications in development efforts. However, in doing so, centralization of development hampers coordination of development activities with complementary activities performed by business units such as marketing and manufacturing, which negatively affects adaptation of development outcomes to business-specific requirements. We test the hypotheses using a unique dataset which comprises all inventions submitted to a global ICT company where organization structure governing development activities shifted from a decentralized structure to a centralized one. Importantly, this dataset contains information on the R&D-unit affiliation of inventions, allowing us to tease out inventions produced by development-oriented units from those by research-focused units and to test the effect of organization structure on development outcomes. We conclude by discussing our study’s contributions to the research on R&D organization structure, corporate strategy, and product platforms.